 |
CFD Review |
 |
|
Site Sponsors |
|
|
Tell a Friend |
|
 |
|
|
Help this site to grow by sending a friend an
invitation to visit this site.
|
|
|
|
|
CFD News by Email |
|
|
|
|
Did you know that you can get today's CFD Review headlines mailed to your inbox?
Just log in and select Email Headlines Each Night on your User Preferences page.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Coming Soon will be Part 4, discussing Comprehensive Software Packages and Part 5, a presentation of the results from our CFD User Survey.
In our original post, we defined the highest-performing CFD software class as “Comprehensive”. The following is our not-so-scientific list of criteria we used for classifying software packages as “Comprehensive” or not.
- The capability to import complex 3D solid and surface geometries from diverse sources
- An all-in-one workflow, including pre-processing, simulation and post-processing
- Broad multi-physics simulation capabilities
- Efficient data architectures, numerical methods and utilization of diverse hardware and software configurations
- Vendor initiated verification and validation of physics and numerical methods
- Limited requirements for user-coding and/or command line operations
In this section, we’re discussing software packages that strive to be comprehensive, multi-physics tools but, in our opinion, fall just a little short in some respect.
Read the full article
|
|
|
|
[ Post Comment ]
< Balancing Meshing Time with Solution Accuracy | Overview of FLOW-3D CAST's Lost Foam Workplace > | |
|
CFD Review Login |
|
|
Related Links |
|
|
]
