CFD Review  
Serving the CFD Community with News, Articles, and Discussion
CFD Review

User Preferences
Site Sponsorship
Headline Feeds
Mobile Edition
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service

Submit a CFD Story

Site Sponsors
The Choice for CFD Meshing
CFD Review

Tell a Friend
Help this site to grow by sending a friend an invitation to visit this site.

CFD News by Email
Did you know that you can get today's CFD Review headlines mailed to your inbox? Just log in and select Email Headlines Each Night on your User Preferences page.

Help with 2D UPWIND Solver
Posted Mon October 09, 2006 @08:38AM
Print version Email story Tweet story
Help Desk tizianoghisu writes "I am trying to write a 2D solver for the Euler equations (initially ...) for simulating the flow inside a channel (or duct). Because the problem is advection dominated (even when I will introduce the stresses ...) I chose to use an upwind discretisation for the fluxes to avoid using artificial viscosity to stabilise the solutions. Initially I am trying a simple 1st order UPWIND (or cell-donor scheme), I might improve it later.

Everything works in 1D, but not in 2D. I guess the problems comes from the fact that the flow is more or less in the same direction of the pseudo-horizontal cell boundaries, and this gives me trouble when discretising the flux through the north and south boundaries.

Any suggestion on how to solve the problem pratically?

Thanks in advance"

Sponsor CFD Review

[ Post Comment ]

Chicken Soup for the CFD Soul | The Best CFD Averaging Methods for Distorted Flow Fields  >


CFD Review Login
User name:


Create an Account

Related Links
  • More on Help Desk
  • Also by nwyman
  • This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

    You will be the last person to buy a Chrysler. All content except comments
    ©2018, Viable Computing.

    [ home | submit story | search | polls | faq | preferences | privacy | terms of service | rss  ]