 |
CFD Review |
 |
|
Site Sponsors |
|
|
Tell a Friend |
|
 |
|
|
Help this site to grow by sending a friend an
invitation to visit this site.
|
|
|
|
|
CFD News by Email |
|
|
|
|
Did you know that you can get today's CFD Review headlines mailed to your inbox?
Just log in and select Email Headlines Each Night on your User Preferences page.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Help with 2D UPWIND Solver |
|
|
|
Posted Mon October 09, 2006 @08:38AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
tizianoghisu writes "I am trying to write a 2D solver for the Euler equations (initially ...) for simulating the flow inside a channel (or duct). Because the problem is advection dominated (even when I will introduce the stresses ...) I chose to use an upwind discretisation for the fluxes to avoid using artificial viscosity to stabilise the solutions. Initially I am trying a simple 1st order UPWIND (or cell-donor scheme), I might improve it later.
Everything works in 1D, but not in 2D. I guess the problems comes from the fact that the flow is more or less in the same direction of the pseudo-horizontal cell boundaries, and this gives me trouble when discretising the flux through the north and south boundaries.
Any suggestion on how to solve the problem pratically?
Thanks in advance"
|
|
|
|
[ Post Comment ]
< Chicken Soup for the CFD Soul | The Best CFD Averaging Methods for Distorted Flow Fields > | |
|
CFD Review Login |
|
|
Related Links |
|
|
]
