CFD Review  
Serving the CFD Community with News, Articles, and Discussion
CFD Review

User Preferences
Site Sponsorship
Headline Feeds
Mobile Edition
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service

Submit a CFD Story

Site Sponsors
Siemens PLM Software
The Choice for CFD Meshing
CFD Review

Tell a Friend
Help this site to grow by sending a friend an invitation to visit this site.

CFD News by Email
Did you know that you can get today's CFD Review headlines mailed to your inbox? Just log in and select Email Headlines Each Night on your User Preferences page.

CFD Used in Redesigning Shuttle Tank for Safety
Posted Thu October 02, 2003 @08:24AM
Print version Email story Tweet story
Application The Huntsville (AL) Times has this story about the redesign effort underway at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center on the space shuttle's external fuel tank.

Marshall engineers have been working on short- and long-range plans that will eliminate known problem areas on the tank where foam comes off during flight, which led to the destruction of the shuttle Columbia Feb. 1. They eventually plan to move the complex fuel lines and cables, which need excessive amounts of insulating foam, from the outside of the tank.

Lab technicians at Marshall in Huntsville have been trying to design improved ways to apply foam to the tank by hand and to devise test programs for a newly shaped external tank, said Neil Otte, Marshall's external tank deputy program manager.

Sponsor CFD Review

To date, Marshall engineers have identified several key areas on the tank where foam can shed during launch. Those include:

A "bipod" area where the orbiter attaches to the tank.

A joint or flange area where the liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen tanks come together.

Several cable and fuel lines that run along the exterior of the tank.

Foam is applied by hand to the cable and fuel line areas at Marshall's Michoud Assembly Facility, the Lockheed Martin-run external tank factory near New Orleans. Columbia accident investigators say the hand-application process is a possible reason the foam shed from the tank. Automated sprays can be better controlled, aerospace experts say.

Changes to fuel lines and foam areas alter the shape of the tank and its flight profile. Engineers have to prove the tank will be stable in flight or it could shake apart, Otte said.

"If we change the mold line of the tank, then we have to go assess what those changes mean aerodynamically," Otte said.

The assessment work is being done primarily at Johnson Space Center with computer simulations through a process called computational fluid dynamics. Basically a computerized wind tunnel simulation, computational fluid dynamics estimates how an object, such as the external tank, will behave in flight.

In the next five years, the external tank may be changed to remove many of the troublesome exterior elements, such as fuel lines and cables, that can lose foam, Otte said.

"We plan to move those inside the tank," he said. "We do have a long-term plan we are putting together that you would begin to notice a difference on the tank."

At present, Otte said, there is no way the shuttle can do without foam, because the propellants must be kept at below minus-300 degrees Fahrenheit. "You've got to have foam, and you've got to have insulation," he said. "What we can do is make it better."

[ Post Comment ]

Amtec Releases Tecplot Version 10 | CFD Workshop - Emerging Trends  >


CFD Review Login
User name:


Create an Account

Related Links
  • NASA
  • story
  • More on Application
  • Also by nwyman
  • This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

    Give thought to your reputation. Consider changing name and moving to a new town. All content except comments
    ©2018, Viable Computing.

    [ home | submit story | search | polls | faq | preferences | privacy | terms of service | rss  ]