Aside from great food and drink, a presentation entitled “The next generation of CFD – STAR-CCM+” will be hosted by the lead developer of the code, who will discuss benefits of the new state-of-the-art technology including:

• A preconditioned coupled solver for all flow speeds
• A fully integrated interactive analysis environment
• Compatibility with all major mesh generation packages

All attendees of the party will also be entered into a free drawing for a next generation telescope.

If you would like to attend, or even if you are unable to attend, but would like to receive further information about STAR CCM+, please visit our website.

We look forward to seeing you there!

Here comes my question. How would I justisfy my approach of using different time step for the same type of analyses when I am dualing with real problems without known experimental data? Critics will shoot me on this "taking incosistent approach issue". So what should I reply them?"

The article also discusses the move toward combined CAD and CFD packages, a move which mirrors the development of FEA and allows for analysis during design.

"Historically, analysis has been relegated to the research and development departments, or the tail end of the design process," Vincent Harrand of CFD Research said. "Imagine the design engineer who, with minimal training or experience, can assess a series of geometrical variants or a series of unique approaches and determine within minutes fluid flow, heat transfer, thermal or structural stress, or any number of other physical phenomena."

RANS modeling is computationally efficient and is known to work well in attached boundary layer flows where the turbulent eddies are "attached". LES modeling, while significantly more expensive computationally, is known to work well in separated flows with "detached" eddies. The DES model is designed to use the RANS and LES modes where appropriate in the flowfield.

The proceedings detail the method and also show some interesting results which indicate the strong potential for this method.

The company will set up a research & development (R&D) centre in Maharashtra.

The $77 million company, which has been operating in the sub-continent and six other countries through its wholly owned subsidiary Fluent India Pvt Ltd (FIPL), will invest at least Rs 25 crore more during the next one year in its upcoming R&D centre in Pune.

The company had invested Rs 30 crore in India in the last fiscal year. The parent company is now gearing up to go public shortly.

Ferit Boysan, president and chief operating officer of Fluent Inc, said, “We will make India our second major hub next to our headquarters in New Hampshire in the US in the next five years. Our activities in this potential market has gained momentum only very recently and the revenues coming in from our Indian operations are not enough to expand our activities in this important market. So we have decided to keep investing in India through our parent company.”

Thank you for your help~~~
Devin"