 |
CFD Review |
 |
 |
Site Sponsors |
 |
 |
Tell a Friend |
 |
 |
 |
|
Help this site to grow by sending a friend an
invitation to visit this site.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
CFD News by Email |
 |
 |
 |
|
Did you know that you can get today's CFD Review headlines mailed to your inbox?
Just log in and select Email Headlines Each Night on your User Preferences page.
|
|
 |
 |
| |
  |
| Business: FLOW SCIENCE, INC. ANNOUNCES NEW ASSOCIATE
|
|
 |
 |
Posted Mon March 11, 2002 @07:50PM
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Tom Jensen writes "SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO, March 8, 2002. Flow Science, Inc. announced today it has entered into an agreement with Complex Flow Design AS (CFD) for CFD to represent Flow Science’s FLOW-3D® computational fluid dynamics software in Scandinavia for both sales and engineering consulting purposes to the civil hydraulics, environmental engineering, process engineering, maritime, oil & gas and MEMS industries. Flow Science’s Associate in Finland, VTT Industrial Systems, will continue to represent FLOW-3D® in Scandinavia for the casting, coating and aerospace industries.
Flow Science, Inc. is a privately held software company specializing in high fidelity fluid dynamics modeling software for industrial and scientific applications worldwide. In addition to its new presence in the UK, Flow Science also has Associates for FLOW-3D® in Japan, Germany, Korea, Finland, Russia, Hong Kong, the United Kingdom and Southeast Asia. Flow Science is located in Santa Fe, NM.
Complex Flow Design AS is a privately held Norwegian company specializing in applied computational fluid dynamics consulting solutions. Complex Flow Design AS is based in Trondheim, Norway.
For information, contact Ms. Rena Coby-Madrid at (505) 982-0088 or rena@flow3d.com or Mr. Ernst Hansen at 47 7383 1741 or ernst.hansen@complex-flow.com."
|
|
 |
 |
  |
| Eye-Popping 3D Displays: From Cheap to Steep |
|
 |
  |
| Events: BRN Offers CFdesign Seminar
|
|
 |
 |
Posted Tue March 05, 2002 @09:20AM
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
drwho gives us this haiku on turbulence modeling:
Turbulence models
zero, two or maybe seven
for right skin friction
Send in your CFD haiku for publication here each week. There is no reward other than perhaps personal enlightenment. So, silence the mind, yield to spontaneity and send in your CFD haiku today.
|
|
 |
 |
  |
| Are Structured Methods Still The Workhorse? |
|
 |
 |
Posted Thu February 28, 2002 @07:21PM
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Unstructured solvers have been around for some time now (even commercially), but how many people are using them for large-scale production CFD work?
Structured grid generation is admittedly cumbersome and time consuming, however, the time spent optimizing the mesh is well rewarded.
The best structured solvers are faster, more accurate, more robust, and use less memory than the best unstructured codes. Also, because structured codes have been around for so long, they tend to have the most physical models.
Furthermore, post-processing tasks are far easier on structured grids. Topological planes within the grid are ideal locations for generating qualitative plots and calculating quantitative values such as mass flow.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
CFD Image Gallery |
 |
 |
Quick Links |
 |
 |
Older Stuff |
 |
|