 |
CFD Review |
 |
 |
Site Sponsors |
 |
 |
Tell a Friend |
 |
 |
 |
|
Help this site to grow by sending a friend an
invitation to visit this site.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
CFD News by Email |
 |
 |
 |
|
Did you know that you can get today's CFD Review headlines mailed to your inbox?
Just log in and select Email Headlines Each Night on your User Preferences page.
|
|
 |
 |
| |
  |
| Project Boosts Performance of Rotor-Stator Flow Calculations |
|
 |
 |
Posted Mon December 02, 2002 @03:05PM
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
By Martin Kuntz and Florian Menter, CFX
During the last three and a half years, CFX has actively participated, as CFD software provider, in the European HPNURSA (High Performance Numerical Unsteady Rotor Stator Analysis) research project. The project, which started in 1998, recently closed with a workshop at the 21st IAHR meeting held in Lausanne, Switzerland in September 2002. Within the project, CFX worked closely with VA TECH HYDRO, as industrial end-user, and the Universities of Lausanne (EPFL) and Lyon (ECL) as academic partners.
The complexity of unsteady rotor-stator flows makes them highly computer intensive, as they require a transient simulation with sufficiently small time steps to resolve the unsteady features of the flow. Furthermore, the full 360-degree machine must generally be modelled, leading to multiple blades per row in the simulation. These demands increase CPU and memory requirements by at least an order of magnitude compared to steady-state simulations. If such computations are to be tractable for industrial users, the use of advanced computer and programming technologies is essential.
These issues have been addressed by the HPNURSA project, providing improvements to the unsteady time integration formulation, enhancements of the transient rotor-stator interface and the optimization of the parallel performance of CFX-TASCflow and CFX-5.
|
|
 |
 |
  |
| FREE Fluent/Ferrari Poster |
|
 |
  |
| Events: First CFX Conference for India
|
|
 |
  |
| Application: Scanning Technology Enables CFD at Reynard
|
|
 |
 |
Posted Mon November 25, 2002 @05:37PM
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
The differences between motor racing on two wheels and four go far deeper than just arithmetic. In Formula 1, for instance, races are routinely won and lost in the pits; on motorbikes, the archaic practice of overtaking is still regularly reported. It is behind the scenes, however – away from the cameras – that the real differences between the two sports really emerge.
At any particular race, a Formula 1 car represents the current state of the art, a snapshot in an ongoing multimillion-pound research and development project. Teams recognize the importance of the most advanced design, simulation and testing techniques – and spend, spend, spend accordingly. The teams that race high performance bikes are every bit as keen to succeed but here the emphasis tends to be more on fine tuning and trimming rather than turning out machines that evolve steadily (sometimes dramatically) throughout a season.
Part of this is down to motorcycle racing’s rules and regulations: in some races every entrant must ride an identical bike, so room for design innovation is distinctly limited. And money is certainly an issue. The fact that individuals still race on a reasonably competitive basis with their more highly funded rivals is a reflection of the fact that cash is spread somewhat thinner than in Formula 1 racing.
|
|
 |
 |
  |
| SGI Has Most Systems In Top 25 Ranking |
|
 |
  |
| Events: Turbulence and Heat Transfer Modeling Seminar
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
CFD Image Gallery |
 |
 |
Quick Links |
 |
 |
Older Stuff |
 |
|